Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Tony Spivey, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Tony Curtis Spivey's motion for a reduction of sentence. Spivey appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in United States v. Spivey. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-05-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 16-6261

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Tony Curtis Spivey's motion for a reduction of sentence. Spivey appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in United States v. Spivey. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    United States v. Tony Spivey, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Tony Curtis Spivey's motion for a reduction of sentence. Spivey appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in United States v. Spivey. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 16-6261

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    TONY CURTIS SPIVEY, a/k/a Tony-Red,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News. Arenda L. Wright Allen,
    District Judge. (4:11-cr-00055-AWA-DEM-19)

    Submitted:

    May 2, 2016

    Decided:

    May 19, 2016

    Before DIAZ and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
    Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Tony Curtis Spivey, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham,


    II, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia,
    Dee Mullarkey Sterling, Assistant United States Attorney,
    Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Tony

    Curtis

    Spivey

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction


    of sentence.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    United States v. Spivey, No. 4:11-cr-00055-AWA-

    DEM-19 (E.D. Va. Feb. 11, 2016).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like