Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    United States v. Courtney Boyd, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Courtney Omar Boyd appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial, finding no error in the district court's ruling. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and determined that the district court correctly denied Boyd's motion to reduce his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Courtney Boyd, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Courtney Omar Boyd appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial, finding no error in the district court's ruling. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and determined that the district court correctly denied Boyd's motion to reduce his sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-05-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 16-6014

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Courtney Omar Boyd appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial, finding no error in the district court's ruling. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and determined that the district court correctly denied Boyd's motion to reduce his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Courtney Boyd, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Courtney Omar Boyd appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial, finding no error in the district court's ruling. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and determined that the district court correctly denied Boyd's motion to reduce his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 16-6014

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    COURTNEY OMAR BOYD, a/k/a Omar,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District
    Judge. (4:06-cr-00005-MSD-FBS-3)

    Submitted:

    May 18, 2016

    Decided:

    May 23, 2016

    Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Courtney Omar Boyd, Appellant Pro Se.


    Eric Matthew Hurt,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Courtney Omar Boyd appeals from the district courts order
    denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion to reduce his
    sentence.

    Our review of the record reveals that the district

    court did not err in denying Boyds motion.


    affirm the district courts order.

    Accordingly, we

    United States v. Boyd, No.

    4:06-cr-00005-MSD-FBS-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 18, 2015).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like