Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ronald McClary v. Michael Munns, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Ronald McClary appealed the district court's order granting summary judgment to defendants and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment for the reasons stated in its order. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of McClary's complaint.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-06-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 16-6114

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ronald McClary appealed the district court's order granting summary judgment to defendants and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment for the reasons stated in its order. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of McClary's complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Ronald McClary v. Michael Munns, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ronald McClary appealed the district court's order granting summary judgment to defendants and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment for the reasons stated in its order. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of McClary's complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 16-6114

    RONALD MCCLARY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    MICHAEL MUNNS; KELLY HARRIS, Dietitian,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Malcolm J. Howard,
    Senior District Judge. (5:14-ct-03183-H)

    Submitted:

    May 26, 2016

    Decided:

    June 1, 2016

    Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit


    Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ronald McClary, Appellant Pro Se. Kari Russwurm Johnson, NORTH


    CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ronald
    judgment

    McClary

    granting

    dismissing

    his

    appeals

    the

    summary

    42

    U.S.C.

    district

    judgment
    1983

    to

    (2012)

    courts
    the

    affirm

    for

    the

    reasons

    stated

    by

    and

    Appellees

    and

    complaint.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.


    we

    order

    the

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    district

    court.

    McClary v. Munns, No. 5:14-ct-03183-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 21, 2016).


    We

    dispense

    contentions

    with
    are

    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the

    facts

    and

    the

    materials

    legal
    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like