Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. Francisco Serrano, 4th Cir. (2016)
United States v. Francisco Serrano, 4th Cir. (2016)
United States v. Francisco Serrano, 4th Cir. (2016)
No. 16-6330
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston.
Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (2:09-cr-00683-SB-6; 2:14-cv-03839-SB)
Submitted:
Decided:
June 23,2016
PER CURIAM:
Francisco
Serrano
seeks
to
appeal
the
district
courts
The
certificate
(2012).
of
appealability.
28
U.S.C.
2253(c)(1)(B)
on
the
demonstrating
district
merits,
that
courts
debatable
or
prisoner
reasonable
assessment
wrong.
satisfies
jurists
would
of
the
v.
McDaniel,
Slack
this
standard
find
constitutional
529
U.S.
by
that
the
claims
is
473,
484
is
debatable,
and
that
the
motion
states
debatable
at 484-85.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Serrano has not made the requisite showing.
Accordingly, we
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
We
legal
contentions
are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED