Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Michael Harmon, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document is a court opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding defendant Michael Devon Harmon's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling denying the sentence reduction. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-06-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 16-6413

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding defendant Michael Devon Harmon's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling denying the sentence reduction. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Michael Harmon, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding defendant Michael Devon Harmon's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling denying the sentence reduction. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 16-6413

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    MICHAEL DEVON HARMON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
    District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior
    District Judge. (1:14-cr-00017-1)

    Submitted:

    June 23, 2016

    Decided:

    June 29, 2016

    Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Devon Harmon, Appellant Pro Se. John Lanier File,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Beckley, West Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael

    Devon

    Harmon

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a


    sentence reduction.
    reversible error.
    by

    the

    district

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    court.

    United

    States

    1:14-cr-00017-1 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 9, 2016).


    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    v.

    Harmon,

    No.

    We dispense with
    contentions
    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like