Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Patterson, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Eddie Patterson appealed the district court's denial in part of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Patterson failed to make the required showing for relief under Section 2255.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-01-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-7051

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Eddie Patterson appealed the district court's denial in part of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Patterson failed to make the required showing for relief under Section 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    United States v. Patterson, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Eddie Patterson appealed the district court's denial in part of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Patterson failed to make the required showing for relief under Section 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-7051

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    EDDIE PATTERSON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
    District Judge. (CR-93-113, CA-96-20-3-P)
    Submitted:

    January 9, 1997

    Decided:

    January 23, 1997

    Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Eddie Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    in part his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (1994), amended by
    Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.
    104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
    deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
    reasoning of the district court. United States v. Patterson, Nos.
    CR-93-113; CA-96-20-3-P (W.D.N.C. June 4, 1996). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like