Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to the appellant in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights case. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's rulings denying the appellant's complaint and various motions, including motions to amend the complaint, for preliminary injunction, and for reconsideration. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument and affirmed the lower court's rulings and denial of relief to the appellant.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-09-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 65 F.3d 167 Docket: 95-6352

    Original Title

    Ronald Jerry Sawyer v. Ron Angelone Doctor Marcorowski Nottoway Correctional Center Doctor Pearson Powhatan Medical Department Doctor of Unit Augusta Correctional Center Marion Correctional Center Colin Anglicker, Dr., 65 F.3d 167, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to the appellant in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights case. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's rulings denying the appellant's complaint and various motions, including motions to amend the complaint, for preliminary injunction, and for reconsideration. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument and affirmed the lower court's rulings and denial of relief to the appellant.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to the appellant in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights case. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's rulings denying the appellant's complaint and various motions, including motions to amend the complaint, for preliminary injunction, and for reconsideration. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument and affirmed the lower court's rulings and denial of relief to the appellant.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    65 F.

    3d 167

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Ronald Jerry SAWYER, Plaintiff--Appellant,
    v.
    Ron ANGELONE; Doctor Marcorowski; Nottoway
    Correctional
    Center; Doctor Pearson; Powhatan Medical Department;
    Doctor of Unit; Augusta Correctional Center; Marion
    Correctional Center; Colin Anglicker, Dr., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 95-6352.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: May 18, 1995
    Decided: September 6, 1995

    Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,


    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42
    U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint and denying a preliminary injunction,
    motion for a discovery conference, motions to amend the complaint to add
    additional Plaintiffs and new Defendants and new claims, and Appellant's
    Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed
    the district court's opinion and orders, and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sawyer v.
    Angelone, No. CA-94-1057-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 2, 6, & 23, 1995). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

    decisional process.*
    AFFIRMED

    We deny Appellant's "Motion for Relief of Order," "Motion to put on new


    evidence," "Motion for Protective Order," "Motion For Appointment of
    Counsel," a motion for a "Cease and Desist Order," "Motion For Prearguement
    (sic) Conference," request for a transportation order, "Motion to Suppress,"
    "Motion For Renewal Of Motions For Default Arguements (sic) and
    Authorities," "Motion To Amend To Conform With Evidence," "Motion For
    Seperate [sic] Trials," "Motion For Misjoinder Of Parties Under Rule 21FACP-In Pro Se," "Motion to Vacate," "Motion For Transfer Of Evidence
    From Record On Appeal To Pending Court Action," motion to vacate district
    court orders, and motion for oral argument

    You might also like