Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    United States v. Bryant, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Isaiah Bryant, IV's motion for review and clarification of the government's refusal to make a motion for downward departure. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's reasons as stated in its May 12, 2004 order. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Bryant, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Isaiah Bryant, IV's motion for review and clarification of the government's refusal to make a motion for downward departure. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's reasons as stated in its May 12, 2004 order. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-10-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-7157

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Isaiah Bryant, IV's motion for review and clarification of the government's refusal to make a motion for downward departure. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's reasons as stated in its May 12, 2004 order. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Bryant, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Isaiah Bryant, IV's motion for review and clarification of the government's refusal to make a motion for downward departure. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's reasons as stated in its May 12, 2004 order. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-7157

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ISAIAH BRYANT, IV,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
    Judge. (CR-01-236)

    Submitted:

    October 14, 2004

    Decided:

    October 22, 2004

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Isaiah Bryant, IV, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Isaiah Bryant, IV, appeals the district courts order
    denying

    his

    Motion

    for

    Review

    and

    Clarification

    of

    Governments Refusal to Make a Motion for Downward Departure.


    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    the
    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    See United States v. Bryant, No. CR-01-236 (E.D. Va. May

    12, 2004).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like