Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Partin v. Morgan, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Paul O. Partin on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against officials at the Newport News City Jail. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny the complaint. The court also denied Partin's motion to appoint counsel.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-01-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7600

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Paul O. Partin on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against officials at the Newport News City Jail. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny the complaint. The court also denied Partin's motion to appoint counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Partin v. Morgan, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Paul O. Partin on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against officials at the Newport News City Jail. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny the complaint. The court also denied Partin's motion to appoint counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7600

    PAUL O. PARTIN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    GABRIEL
    MORGAN,
    Sheriff,
    Newport
    News
    City
    Jail,
    Professional Capacity; J. VERGAKIS, Captain/Jail Admin.,
    Newport
    News
    City
    Jail,
    Professional
    and
    Individual
    Capacity; GRAVES, Ms., Programs Coordinator/Law Library
    Supervisor, Newport News City Jail, Professional and
    Individual Capacity; JOHNSON, Mr., Col. Security/Sheriff
    Asst., Newport News City Jail, Professional and Individual
    Capacity; EILEEN SPRINKLE, Lt. Col./Chief, Newport News City
    Jail, Professional and Individual Capacity,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Henry E. Hudson, District
    Judge. (3:08-cv-00238-HEH)

    Submitted:

    January 19, 2010

    Decided:

    January 27, 2010

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Paul O. Partin, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Paul O. Partin, a state prisoner, appeals the district
    courts
    judge

    order
    and

    complaint.
    error.

    accepting

    denying

    relief

    recommendation
    on

    his

    42

    of

    U.S.C.

    the

    magistrate

    1983

    (2006)

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    Partin v. Morgan, No. 3:08-cv-00238-HEH (E.D.

    Va. July 28, 2009).


    We

    the

    dispense

    with

    We deny Partins motion to appoint counsel.


    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like