Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Pitt, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Donte Javon Pitt's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error, denying Pitt's motion for a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the district court's reasoning. The appellate court determined that oral arguments would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-03-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7880

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Donte Javon Pitt's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error, denying Pitt's motion for a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the district court's reasoning. The appellate court determined that oral arguments would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Pitt, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Donte Javon Pitt's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error, denying Pitt's motion for a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the district court's reasoning. The appellate court determined that oral arguments would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7880

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    DONTE JAVON PITT,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
    (CR-96-36-AW, CA-00-1566-AW)

    Submitted:

    March 14, 2002

    Decided:

    March 22, 2002

    Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Fred Warren Bennett, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Odessa
    Palmer Jackson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt,
    Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Donte Javon Pitt seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    2001).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny Pitts

    motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on


    the reasoning of the district court.

    See United States v. Pitt,

    Nos. CR-96-36-AW; CA-00-1566-AW (D. Md. filed Aug. 31, 2001 &
    entered Sept. 4, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like