Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Nathan A. Thorne v. R.K. Bynum, Robert R. Kelly, James Smith, 838 F.2d 1210, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The document is an unpublished appellate court decision from February 1988 affirming the lower district court's denial of relief to Nathan Thorne under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The appellate panel found the appeal without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The panel affirmed the lower court's judgment, dispensing with oral argument because the issues had been recently and authoritatively decided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-02-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 838 F.2d 1210 Docket: 87-7271

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an unpublished appellate court decision from February 1988 affirming the lower district court's denial of relief to Nathan Thorne under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The appellate panel found the appeal without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The panel affirmed the lower court's judgment, dispensing with oral argument because the issues had been recently and authoritatively decided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Nathan A. Thorne v. R.K. Bynum, Robert R. Kelly, James Smith, 838 F.2d 1210, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished appellate court decision from February 1988 affirming the lower district court's denial of relief to Nathan Thorne under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The appellate panel found the appeal without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The panel affirmed the lower court's judgment, dispensing with oral argument because the issues had been recently and authoritatively decided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    838 F.

    2d 1210
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Nathan A. THORNE, Plaintiff-Appellant.
    v.
    R.K. BYNUM, Robert R. Kelly, James Smith, DefendantsAppellees.
    No. 87-7271.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Nov. 27, 1987.
    Decided: Feb. 5, 1988.

    Nathan A. Thorne, appellant pro se.


    Nelson H.C. Fisher, Office of Attorney General of Virginia, for appellees.
    E.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before WIDENER and JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges,
    and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
    from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit.
    Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
    dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of
    the district court. Thorne v. Bynum, C/A No. 86-570-N (E.D.Va. June 18,
    1987).

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like