Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ronald Luber v. Anne Arundel County, Maryland, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Ronald Luber's civil rights complaint. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) for failing to state a claim. The Court of Appeals reviewed the district court's decision and the record and affirmed the dismissal for the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-06-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-1099

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Ronald Luber's civil rights complaint. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) for failing to state a claim. The Court of Appeals reviewed the district court's decision and the record and affirmed the dismissal for the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Ronald Luber v. Anne Arundel County, Maryland, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Ronald Luber's civil rights complaint. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) for failing to state a claim. The Court of Appeals reviewed the district court's decision and the record and affirmed the dismissal for the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-1099

    RONALD LUBER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND; LAURA
    Executive, In Her Official Capacity,

    A.

    NEWMAN,

    County

    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    James K. Bredar, District Judge.
    (1:14-cv-00001-JKB)

    Submitted:

    May 29, 2014

    Decided:

    June 2, 2014

    Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ronald Luber, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ronald Luber appeals a district court order dismissing
    his civil rights complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) (2012)
    for failing to state a claim.

    We have reviewed the courts

    memorandum and the record and affirm for the reasons stated by
    the court.

    See Luber v. Anne Arundel Cnty., Md., No. 1:14-cv-

    00001-JKB (D. Md. entered Jan. 13, 2014, filed Jan. 14, 2014).
    We

    dispense

    contentions

    with
    are

    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the

    facts

    and

    the

    materials

    legal
    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like