Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Larry Gunnell, JR., 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Larry Roscoe Gunnell, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motions for correction of a clerical error and for reconsideration. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials provided and oral arguments would not aid their decision. The district court's rulings were therefore affirmed.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-11-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6743

    Original Title

    United States v. Larry Gunnell, Jr., 4th Cir. (2012)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Larry Roscoe Gunnell, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motions for correction of a clerical error and for reconsideration. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials provided and oral arguments would not aid their decision. The district court's rulings were therefore affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Larry Gunnell, JR., 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Larry Roscoe Gunnell, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motions for correction of a clerical error and for reconsideration. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials provided and oral arguments would not aid their decision. The district court's rulings were therefore affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6743

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    LARRY ROSCOE GUNNELL, JR.,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, District
    Judge. (3:99-cr-00022-JRS-1)

    Submitted:

    September 25, 2012

    Decided:

    November 6, 2012

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Larry Roscoe Gunnell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


    Norval George
    Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Larry

    Roscoe

    Gunnell,

    Jr.,

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts order denying his motions for correction of clerical


    error under Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 and for reconsideration.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    United States v. Gunnell, No. 3:99-cr-00022-JRS-1 (E.D.

    Va. Dec. 16, 2011 & Mar. 30, 2012).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like