Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Merinar v. Parkersburg Police, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief for James Merinar's § 1983 complaint against the Parkersburg Police Force, Parkersburg Welfare Officials, and State Farm Insurance Company. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation to deny relief. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the lower court's opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-01-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7361

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief for James Merinar's § 1983 complaint against the Parkersburg Police Force, Parkersburg Welfare Officials, and State Farm Insurance Company. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation to deny relief. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the lower court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Merinar v. Parkersburg Police, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief for James Merinar's § 1983 complaint against the Parkersburg Police Force, Parkersburg Welfare Officials, and State Farm Insurance Company. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation to deny relief. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the lower court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7361

    JAMES L. MERINAR,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    PARKERSBURG POLICE FORCE; PARKERSBURG WELFARE
    OFFICIALS; STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-95-536-6)
    Submitted:

    January 11, 1996

    Decided:

    January 24, 1996

    Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    James L. Merinar, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the
    record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate
    judge's recommendation, and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Merinar v.
    Parkersburg Police, No. CA-95-536-6 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 21, 1995). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like