Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    United States v. Fleming, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kelvin Fleming appealed the district court's denial of his motion to correct his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with the reasons stated by the lower court in denying Fleming's motion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Fleming, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Kelvin Fleming appealed the district court's denial of his motion to correct his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with the reasons stated by the lower court in denying Fleming's motion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-07-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-6460

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Kelvin Fleming appealed the district court's denial of his motion to correct his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with the reasons stated by the lower court in denying Fleming's motion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Fleming, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kelvin Fleming appealed the district court's denial of his motion to correct his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with the reasons stated by the lower court in denying Fleming's motion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-6460

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    KELVIN FLEMING,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
    District Judge. (1:96-cr-00031-JCC)

    Submitted: July 20, 2006

    Decided: July 27, 2006

    Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kelvin Fleming, Appellant Pro Se. Morris Rudolph Parker, Jr.,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Kelvin Fleming appeals the district courts order denying
    his motion to correct his sentence.
    and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v. Fleming,

    No. 1:96-cr-00031-JCC (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 24, 2006 & entered
    Feb. 27, 2006).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like