Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Dewayne Parris v. Warden Eric Wilson, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Dewayne Antonio Parris's § 2241 petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error because Parris was not entitled to relief under Alleyne v. United States. The court granted Parris leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirmed the district court's order dismissing the petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Dewayne Parris v. Warden Eric Wilson, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Dewayne Antonio Parris's § 2241 petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error because Parris was not entitled to relief under Alleyne v. United States. The court granted Parris leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirmed the district court's order dismissing the petition.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-06-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6141

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Dewayne Antonio Parris's § 2241 petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error because Parris was not entitled to relief under Alleyne v. United States. The court granted Parris leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirmed the district court's order dismissing the petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Dewayne Parris v. Warden Eric Wilson, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Dewayne Antonio Parris's § 2241 petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error because Parris was not entitled to relief under Alleyne v. United States. The court granted Parris leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirmed the district court's order dismissing the petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6141

    DEWAYNE ANTONIO PARRIS,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    WARDEN ERIC WILSON, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
    Judge. (2:13-cv-00540-RAJ-DEM)

    Submitted:

    May 30, 2014

    Decided:

    June 6, 2014

    Before KING, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Dewayne Antonio Parris, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Dewayne

    Antonio

    Parris,

    federal

    prisoner,

    appeals

    the district courts order dismissing without prejudice his 28


    U.S.C. 2241 (2012) petition.
    find

    no

    reversible

    error

    We have reviewed the record and

    because

    Parris

    is

    not

    entitled

    to

    relief under Alleyne v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2151 (2013).


    Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
    affirm

    the

    district

    courts

    order.

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like