Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Nelson-Richards v. Board of Trustees, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to the defendants in an employment discrimination suit brought by the plaintiff-appellant. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appellate court thus affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the district court's prior opinions dated July 25, 1994, September 9, 1994, and July 22, 1996. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented for decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-02-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-2313

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to the defendants in an employment discrimination suit brought by the plaintiff-appellant. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appellate court thus affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the district court's prior opinions dated July 25, 1994, September 9, 1994, and July 22, 1996. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented for decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Nelson-Richards v. Board of Trustees, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to the defendants in an employment discrimination suit brought by the plaintiff-appellant. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appellate court thus affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the district court's prior opinions dated July 25, 1994, September 9, 1994, and July 22, 1996. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented for decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-2313

    MELSOME NELSON-RICHARDS, Ph.D.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONTGOMERY COMMUNITY
    COLLEGE; ROBERT E. PARILLA, Dr.,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
    (CA-93-323-WN)
    Submitted:

    February 13, 1997

    Decided:

    February 25, 1997

    Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Melsome Nelson-Richards, Appellant Pro Se. Linda B. Thall, Senior
    Assistant County Attorney, Sharon Veronica Burrell, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland; Darrell Robert VanDeusen,
    KOLLMAN & SHEEHAN, Baltimore, Maryland; Joan I. Gordon, General
    Counsel, MONTGOMERY COLLEGE, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary
    judgment to Defendants in Appellant's employment discrimination
    suit. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. Nelson-Richards v. Board of Trustees of Montgomery
    Community College, No. CA-93-323-WN (D. Md. July 25 & Sept. 9,
    1994; July 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like