Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • McKee v. Walker, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    David McKee filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Officer Walker and the Arlington County Jail which was denied by the district court. McKee appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in McKee v. Walker, No. CA-04-86 (E.D. Va. July 16, 2004). The Fourth Circuit also denied McKee's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-11-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-7221

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    David McKee filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Officer Walker and the Arlington County Jail which was denied by the district court. McKee appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in McKee v. Walker, No. CA-04-86 (E.D. Va. July 16, 2004). The Fourth Circuit also denied McKee's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    McKee v. Walker, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    David McKee filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Officer Walker and the Arlington County Jail which was denied by the district court. McKee appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in McKee v. Walker, No. CA-04-86 (E.D. Va. July 16, 2004). The Fourth Circuit also denied McKee's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-7221

    DAVID MCKEE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    OFFICER WALKER; ARLINGTON COUNTY JAIL,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-04-86)

    Submitted:

    November 4, 2004

    Decided:

    November 10, 2004

    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    David McKee, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    David McKee appeals the district courts order accepting
    the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
    his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.


    CA-04-86 (E.D. Va. July 16, 2004).

    See McKee v. Walker, No.


    We deny McKees motion for

    appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like