Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Donald Farrow v. State of North Carolina, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Donald Durrant Farrow appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the State of North Carolina and state court judges and clerks. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The unpublished opinion states that the appellate court reviewed the record and agrees with the district court's reasons for denying Farrow's complaint. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-06-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6355

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Donald Durrant Farrow appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the State of North Carolina and state court judges and clerks. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The unpublished opinion states that the appellate court reviewed the record and agrees with the district court's reasons for denying Farrow's complaint. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Donald Farrow v. State of North Carolina, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Donald Durrant Farrow appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the State of North Carolina and state court judges and clerks. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The unpublished opinion states that the appellate court reviewed the record and agrees with the district court's reasons for denying Farrow's complaint. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6355

    DONALD DURRANT FARROW,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; CLERK JOHN DOE, Clerk of Superior
    Court; JUDGE JOHN DOE, Resident Superior Court Judge,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Dever, III,
    Chief District Judge. (5:13-ct-03100-D)

    Submitted:

    June 26, 2014

    Decided:

    June 30, 2014

    Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Donald Durrant Farrow, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Donald

    Durrant

    Farrow

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint.


    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Farrow v. North Carolina, No. 5:13-ct-03100-D (E.D.N.C.

    Feb. 18, 2014).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like