Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Thomas Graves v. R.T. Shurling G. Johnson T.B. Watson Lt. Tuker W. Davis Sgt. Ferguson Captain Davis S. Pruitt, 803 F.2d 1180, 4th Cir. (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Thomas Graves filed a Section 1983 lawsuit against prison officials alleging civil rights violations. The district court denied Graves relief and he appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without oral argument, finding that the issues had been recently decided and the appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court in denying Graves relief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1986-10-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 803 F.2d 1180 Docket: 86-6592

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Thomas Graves filed a Section 1983 lawsuit against prison officials alleging civil rights violations. The district court denied Graves relief and he appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without oral argument, finding that the issues had been recently decided and the appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court in denying Graves relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Thomas Graves v. R.T. Shurling G. Johnson T.B. Watson Lt. Tuker W. Davis Sgt. Ferguson Captain Davis S. Pruitt, 803 F.2d 1180, 4th Cir. (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Thomas Graves filed a Section 1983 lawsuit against prison officials alleging civil rights violations. The district court denied Graves relief and he appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without oral argument, finding that the issues had been recently decided and the appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court in denying Graves relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    803 F.

    2d 1180
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Thomas GRAVES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    R.T. SHURLING; G. Johnson; T.B. Watson; Lt. Tuker; W.
    Davis; Sgt. Ferguson; Captain Davis; S. Pruitt;
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 86-6592.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Aug. 15, 1986.
    Decided Oct. 23, 1986.

    Thomas Graves, appellant pro se.


    William W. Muse, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.
    E.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before SPROUSE, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
    from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit.
    Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
    dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of
    the district court. Graves v. Shurling, C/A No. 84-759-N (E.D.Va., April 18,
    1986).

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like