Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Norman G. Berg filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint that was dismissed as frivolous by the district court. Berg appealed the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided by the lower court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views1 page
    Norman G. Berg filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint that was dismissed as frivolous by the district court. Berg appealed the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided by the lower court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-09-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 96 F.3d 1438 Docket: 96-6509

    Original Title

    Norman G. Berg v. Rufus Fleming, Regional Administrator David Robinson, Warden Grace Seymour, Sergeant, Investigator Kern Gilliam, Business Manager, 96 F.3d 1438, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Norman G. Berg filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint that was dismissed as frivolous by the district court. Berg appealed the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided by the lower court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views1 page

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Norman G. Berg filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint that was dismissed as frivolous by the district court. Berg appealed the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided by the lower court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    96 F.

    3d 1438

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Norman G. BERG, Plaintiff--Appellant,
    v.
    Rufus FLEMING, Regional Administrator; David Robinson,
    Warden; Grace Seymour, Sergeant, Investigator;
    Kern Gilliam, Business Manager,
    Defendants--Appellees.
    No. 96-6509.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Sept. 4, 1996.

    Norman G. Berg, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before HALL, MICHAEL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1988) complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the
    district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Berg v. Fleming, No. CA-96-176-AM
    (E.D.Va. Feb. 13, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like