Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    In Re: Wood, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Carlos Woods filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court had unduly delayed acting on his motion for a new trial and new counsel. The Court of Appeals reviewed the district court docket and found that the district court had recently denied Woods' motion, rendering the mandamus petition moot. As such, the court denied the petition for a writ of mandamus.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    In Re: Wood, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Carlos Woods filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court had unduly delayed acting on his motion for a new trial and new counsel. The Court of Appeals reviewed the district court docket and found that the district court had recently denied Woods' motion, rendering the mandamus petition moot. As such, the court denied the petition for a writ of mandamus.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-03-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 092253

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Carlos Woods filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court had unduly delayed acting on his motion for a new trial and new counsel. The Court of Appeals reviewed the district court docket and found that the district court had recently denied Woods' motion, rendering the mandamus petition moot. As such, the court denied the petition for a writ of mandamus.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    In Re: Wood, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Carlos Woods filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court had unduly delayed acting on his motion for a new trial and new counsel. The Court of Appeals reviewed the district court docket and found that the district court had recently denied Woods' motion, rendering the mandamus petition moot. As such, the court denied the petition for a writ of mandamus.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-2253

    In Re:

    CARLOS WOODS,
    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

    Submitted:

    March 8, 2010

    (1:07-cr-00127-WDQ-1)

    Decided:

    March 15, 2010

    Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Carlos Woods, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Carlos

    Woods

    petitions

    for

    writ

    of

    mandamus,

    alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on


    his motion for a new trial and new counsel.

    He seeks an order

    from this court directing the district court to act.

    Our review

    of the district courts docket sheet reveals that the district


    court recently denied Woods motion.

    Accordingly, because the

    district court has acted on the motion, we deny the mandamus


    petition as moot.

    We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

    We

    oral

    dispense

    with

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like