Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 15 views

    United States v. Handy, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed William Handy Jr.'s appeal of the district court's denial of his motion for release on bail pending resolution of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The appeals court noted that the district court had recently denied Handy's § 2255 motion. As the relief sought in the bail motion was no longer available, the appeals court dismissed the appeal as moot.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Handy, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    15 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed William Handy Jr.'s appeal of the district court's denial of his motion for release on bail pending resolution of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The appeals court noted that the district court had recently denied Handy's § 2255 motion. As the relief sought in the bail motion was no longer available, the appeals court dismissed the appeal as moot.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-09-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-6607

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed William Handy Jr.'s appeal of the district court's denial of his motion for release on bail pending resolution of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The appeals court noted that the district court had recently denied Handy's § 2255 motion. As the relief sought in the bail motion was no longer available, the appeals court dismissed the appeal as moot.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    15 views2 pages

    United States v. Handy, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed William Handy Jr.'s appeal of the district court's denial of his motion for release on bail pending resolution of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The appeals court noted that the district court had recently denied Handy's § 2255 motion. As the relief sought in the bail motion was no longer available, the appeals court dismissed the appeal as moot.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-6607

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    WILLIAM L. HANDY, JR., a/k/a B,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    Alexander Williams, Jr., District
    Judge. (8:04-cr-00559-AW-7; 8:09-cv-02011-AW)

    Submitted:

    August 26, 2010

    Decided:

    September 2, 2010

    Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    William L. Handy, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


    Bryan E. Foreman,
    Robert K. Hur, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenbelt,
    Maryland; Sandra Wilkinson, Assistant United States Attorney,
    Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    William L. Handy, Jr., appeals the district courts
    order denying his Motion Requesting Release on Bail Pending
    Resolution

    of

    Petitioners

    28

    U.S.C.[A.]

    2255

    [(West

    Supp.

    2010)] Motion Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3143(b) [(2006)] and the


    Courts Inherent Power.
    court

    recently

    because

    the

    denied

    relief

    Our review reveals that the district


    Handys

    Handy

    2255

    seeks

    dismiss his appeal as moot.

    is

    no

    motion.
    longer

    Accordingly,
    available,

    we

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED

    You might also like