Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ronald Graham v. David A. Garraghty, Warden Mary Davis Dorothy Cook Sergeant Haily Officer Sing Officer Newcomb, 808 F.2d 834, 4th Cir. (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views1 page
    The document is an unpublished court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 by Ronald Graham against several prison officials. In a per curiam opinion, the three-judge panel found that after reviewing the record and the magistrate's opinion, Graham's appeal was without merit. The court affirmed the lower court's judgment in the case based on the reasoning provided by the magistrate in an earlier decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1986-12-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 808 F.2d 834 Docket: 86-7235

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an unpublished court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 by Ronald Graham against several prison officials. In a per curiam opinion, the three-judge panel found that after reviewing the record and the magistrate's opinion, Graham's appeal was without merit. The court affirmed the lower court's judgment in the case based on the reasoning provided by the magistrate in an earlier decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views1 page

    Ronald Graham v. David A. Garraghty, Warden Mary Davis Dorothy Cook Sergeant Haily Officer Sing Officer Newcomb, 808 F.2d 834, 4th Cir. (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 by Ronald Graham against several prison officials. In a per curiam opinion, the three-judge panel found that after reviewing the record and the magistrate's opinion, Graham's appeal was without merit. The court affirmed the lower court's judgment in the case based on the reasoning provided by the magistrate in an earlier decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    808 F.

    2d 834
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Ronald GRAHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    David A. GARRAGHTY, Warden; Mary Davis; Dorothy Cook;
    Sergeant Haily; Officer Sing; Officer Newcomb,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 86-7235.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Sept. 19, 1986.
    Decided Dec. 18, 1986.

    Before PHILLIPS, ERVIN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.


    Ronald Graham, appellant pro se.
    Mark Ralph Davis, Richard Francis Gorman, III, Office of the Attorney
    General of Virginia, for appellees.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that this appeal
    from the order refusing relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit.
    Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
    dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of
    the magistrate. Graham v. Garraghty, C/A No. 85-0941-R (E.D.VA., August 4,
    1986).

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like