Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • John Rodgers Burnley v. Twyla W. Glascock William R. Loving, 808 F.2d 834, 4th Cir. (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views1 page
    John Rodgers Burnley filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Twyla W. Glascock and William R. Loving. A magistrate denied Burnley relief and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the magistrate's decision without oral argument. The Fourth Circuit found the appeal to be without merit based on the record, the magistrate's opinions, and issues recently decided authoritatively. The court affirmed the lower court's judgment, relying on the reasoning of the magistrate in the Eastern District of Virginia case of Burnley v. Glascock.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1986-12-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 808 F.2d 834 Docket: 86-6653

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    John Rodgers Burnley filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Twyla W. Glascock and William R. Loving. A magistrate denied Burnley relief and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the magistrate's decision without oral argument. The Fourth Circuit found the appeal to be without merit based on the record, the magistrate's opinions, and issues recently decided authoritatively. The court affirmed the lower court's judgment, relying on the reasoning of the magistrate in the Eastern District of Virginia case of Burnley v. Glascock.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views1 page

    John Rodgers Burnley v. Twyla W. Glascock William R. Loving, 808 F.2d 834, 4th Cir. (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    John Rodgers Burnley filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Twyla W. Glascock and William R. Loving. A magistrate denied Burnley relief and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the magistrate's decision without oral argument. The Fourth Circuit found the appeal to be without merit based on the record, the magistrate's opinions, and issues recently decided authoritatively. The court affirmed the lower court's judgment, relying on the reasoning of the magistrate in the Eastern District of Virginia case of Burnley v. Glascock.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    808 F.

    2d 834
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    John Rodgers BURNLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Twyla W. GLASCOCK; William R. Loving, DefendantAppellees.
    No. 86-6653.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Nov. 12, 1986.
    Decided Dec. 29, 1986.

    Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,


    Senior Circuit Judge.
    John Rodgers Burnley, pro se.
    Mark R. Davis, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the magistrate's opinions discloses that this appeal
    from the order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit.
    Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
    dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of
    the magistrate. Burnley v. Glascock, C/A No. 85-152-R (E.D.Va., June 16,
    1986).

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like