Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Darrell Andre Burris v. Sergeant Judd Sergeant Smiley, 69 F.3d 532, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views1 page
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from October 26, 1995. It involves a plaintiff, Darrell Andre Burris, who filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against two defendants, Sergeant Judd and Sergeant Smiley, that was dismissed as frivolous by the district court. The Court of Appeals affirms the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's opinion that dismissed the case. The appeals court dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal issues are clear based on the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-10-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 69 F.3d 532 Docket: 95-7215

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from October 26, 1995. It involves a plaintiff, Darrell Andre Burris, who filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against two defendants, Sergeant Judd and Sergeant Smiley, that was dismissed as frivolous by the district court. The Court of Appeals affirms the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's opinion that dismissed the case. The appeals court dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal issues are clear based on the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views1 page

    Darrell Andre Burris v. Sergeant Judd Sergeant Smiley, 69 F.3d 532, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from October 26, 1995. It involves a plaintiff, Darrell Andre Burris, who filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against two defendants, Sergeant Judd and Sergeant Smiley, that was dismissed as frivolous by the district court. The Court of Appeals affirms the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's opinion that dismissed the case. The appeals court dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal issues are clear based on the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    69 F.

    3d 532

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Darrell Andre BURRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Sergeant JUDD; Sergeant Smiley, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 95-7215.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: October 12, 1995.
    Decided: October 26, 1995.

    Darrell Andre Burris, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec.
    1983 (1988) claim as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) (1988). We
    have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Burris v.
    Judd, No. CA-95-528-5 (E.D.N.C. July 26, 1995). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like