Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Wright v. Robinson, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Walter Lee Wright filed a § 1983 complaint against Maryland prison officials which was denied by the district court. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed the denial of relief based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its July 3, 1997 opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Wright v. Robinson, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Walter Lee Wright filed a § 1983 complaint against Maryland prison officials which was denied by the district court. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed the denial of relief based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its July 3, 1997 opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials submitted.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-07-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-7035

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Walter Lee Wright filed a § 1983 complaint against Maryland prison officials which was denied by the district court. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed the denial of relief based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its July 3, 1997 opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Wright v. Robinson, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Walter Lee Wright filed a § 1983 complaint against Maryland prison officials which was denied by the district court. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed the denial of relief based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its July 3, 1997 opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-7035

    WALTER LEE WRIGHT,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    BISHOP L. ROBINSON, Secretary of Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional
    Services; THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden sued in
    his individual and official capacities; GARY
    HORNBAKER, Assistant Warden sued in his individual and official capacities; JAMES MURPHY,
    Chief of Security sued in his individual and
    official capacities; MICHAEL MILLER, Classification Counsel sued in his individual and
    official capacities,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
    (CA-96-3748-AW, CA-96-3749-AW)

    Submitted:

    June 18, 1998

    Decided:

    July 2, 1998

    Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Walter Lee Wright, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
    OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Wright v. Robinson, Nos. CA-96-3748-AW; CA-96-3749-AW, (D.
    Md. July 3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like