Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hieda Keeler v. James Fox, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views3 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order denying Hieda Keeler's motions and dismissing her civil action for lack of jurisdiction. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. The appellate court also denied Keeler's request for oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-06-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-1328

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order denying Hieda Keeler's motions and dismissing her civil action for lack of jurisdiction. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. The appellate court also denied Keeler's request for oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views3 pages

    Hieda Keeler v. James Fox, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order denying Hieda Keeler's motions and dismissing her civil action for lack of jurisdiction. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. The appellate court also denied Keeler's request for oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-1328

    HIEDA A. KEELER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    POLICE CHIEF JAMES D. FOX; OFFICER THOMAS A. SHULL, JR.;
    OFFICER DAVID GREEN; OFFICER JUSTIN BRIGGS; OFFICER MICHELLE
    RIVERA; SERGEANT JOHN POLAK; LIEUTENANT SUTTON; DETECTIVE M.
    JOHNSON; OFFICER HOSE H. HERNANDEZ-ZAMORA; CAPTAIN LARRY
    MINKOFF; NEWPORT NEWS SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; SHERIFF GABE
    MORGAN; SHERIFF MALE, responded to Riverside; SHERIFF
    FEMALE, responded to Riverside; VIRGINIA BEACH PSYCHIATRIC
    CENTER; DR. STEPHEN G. CUNNINGHAM; DR. MARK G. CLARKE;
    ATTORNEY JUDITH DOCKERY; ATTORNEY CHAD DORSK; OFFICER
    NEIDENGARD; OFFICER JUNEAU; SERGEANT HINES; OFFICER HANKINS;
    PAUL COMPTON, Virginia State Police Trooper; TONY PASSARO,
    Virginia State Police Trooper; DARRELL HOLLOWELL, Virginia
    State Police Trooper; FEMALE EMT, Newport News EMT; MALE
    EMT, Newport News EMT; CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda Wright Allen, District
    Judge. (2:12-cv-00325-AWA-TEM)

    Submitted:

    June 20, 2013

    Decided:

    Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    June 25, 2013

    Hieda A. Keeler, Appellant Pro Se.


    Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER &
    COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Rodney Seth Dillman,
    HANCOCK, DANIEL, JOHNSON & NAGLE, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia;
    Megan Paulita Bradshaw, Dante Medardo Filetti, GOODMAN, ALLEN &
    FILETTI, PLLC, Norfolk, Virginia; Farnaz Farkish, OFFICE OF THE
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Joshua James
    Coe, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Darlene P. Bradberry, OFFICE OF
    THE CITY ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Hieda

    A.

    Keeler

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying her Motion to deny Consent Order Granting Substitution


    of Attorney, Motion for Hearing, and Motion for Recusal,
    and dismissing her civil action for lack of jurisdiction.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    Accordingly,

    although

    pauperis,

    affirm

    court.

    we

    before

    for

    grant
    the

    find

    no

    reversible

    leave

    to

    proceed

    reasons

    stated

    by

    error.

    in

    the

    forma

    district

    Keeler v. Fox, No. 2:12-cv-00325-AWA-TEM (E.D. Va. Feb.

    19, 2013).
    legal

    we

    and

    We

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like