Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 23 views

    Ditton v. Bank of America, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order upholding the bankruptcy court's granting of summary judgment in favor of the defendants in an adversary proceeding brought by Michael H. Ditton. The appellate court reviewed the record and opinions below and found no reversible error. The court adopted the reasoning of the district court in affirming the bankruptcy court's rulings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Ditton v. Bank of America, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    23 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order upholding the bankruptcy court's granting of summary judgment in favor of the defendants in an adversary proceeding brought by Michael H. Ditton. The appellate court reviewed the record and opinions below and found no reversible error. The court adopted the reasoning of the district court in affirming the bankruptcy court's rulings.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-02-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-1428

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order upholding the bankruptcy court's granting of summary judgment in favor of the defendants in an adversary proceeding brought by Michael H. Ditton. The appellate court reviewed the record and opinions below and found no reversible error. The court adopted the reasoning of the district court in affirming the bankruptcy court's rulings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    23 views2 pages

    Ditton v. Bank of America, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order upholding the bankruptcy court's granting of summary judgment in favor of the defendants in an adversary proceeding brought by Michael H. Ditton. The appellate court reviewed the record and opinions below and found no reversible error. The court adopted the reasoning of the district court in affirming the bankruptcy court's rulings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-1428

    In Re: MICHAEL H. DITTON,


    Debtor.

    MICHAEL H. DITTON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION; CAPITAL ONE
    SERVICES, INCORPORATED; BANK OF AMERICA NT&SA;
    FEDERAL HOME
    LOAN
    MORTGAGE
    CORPORATION;
    CRESTAR BANK,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
    Judge. (CA-99-1745-A, BK-98-10301, AP-99-1002)

    Submitted:

    February 6, 2001

    Decided:

    February 16, 2001

    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Henry Ditton, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Francis Lynch, III,
    James A. Murphy, Jr., Harris Lee Kay, LECLAIR RYAN, P.C., Richmond,
    Virginia; Cindra Myers Dowd, GLASSER & GLASSER, Norfolk, Virginia;
    C. Thomas Brown, SILVER & BROWN, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael H. Ditton appeals from the district courts order affirming the bankruptcy courts orders granting summary judgment in
    favor of the Defendants in this adversary proceeding.

    We have

    reviewed the record and the opinions below and find no reversible
    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court.

    See Ditton v. Bank of America, Nos. CA-99-1745-A; BK-98-

    10301 (E.D. Va. Feb. 29, 2000).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like