Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Wang, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    1) Xinhua Wang appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. 3) The Fourth Circuit therefore denied Wang a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-01-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7129

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Xinhua Wang appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. 3) The Fourth Circuit therefore denied Wang a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Wang, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Xinhua Wang appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. 3) The Fourth Circuit therefore denied Wang a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7129

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    XINHUA WANG, a/k/a William Wang,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CR-99-279-A, CA-01-293-AM)

    Submitted:

    November 29, 2001

    Decided:

    January 24, 2002

    Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Xinhua Wang, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Higgins McQuillan, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Xinhua Wang seeks to appeal the district courts orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 2001).
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinions and
    find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wang, Nos. CR-99-279-A; CA-01-293-AM
    (E.D. Va. Mar. 1, 2001 & May 3, 2001).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like