Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Edward Bowie v. Henderson Police Department, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views3 pages
    Edward Bowie filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Henderson Police Department which was denied by the district court. Bowie appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the records. The Fourth Circuit concluded that Bowie's contentions were adequately addressed in the materials presented and that oral arguments would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-05-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-2448

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Edward Bowie filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Henderson Police Department which was denied by the district court. Bowie appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the records. The Fourth Circuit concluded that Bowie's contentions were adequately addressed in the materials presented and that oral arguments would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views3 pages

    Edward Bowie v. Henderson Police Department, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Edward Bowie filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Henderson Police Department which was denied by the district court. Bowie appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the records. The Fourth Circuit concluded that Bowie's contentions were adequately addressed in the materials presented and that oral arguments would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-2448

    EDWARD BOWIE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE,
    Defendants Appellees.

    No. 13-1131

    EDWARD BOWIE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE,
    Defendants Appellees.

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Louise W. Flanagan,
    District Judge. (5:12-cv-00514-FL)

    Submitted:

    May 23, 2013

    Decided:

    May 28, 2013

    Before MOTZ and


    Circuit Judge.

    AGEE,

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    HAMILTON,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Edward Bowie, Appellant Pro Se.


    Kari Russwurm Johnson,
    CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    In
    the

    these

    district

    consolidated

    courts

    orders

    1983 (2006) complaint.


    no reversible error.

    appeals,

    denying

    Edward

    relief

    on

    Bowie
    his

    appeals

    42

    U.S.C.

    We have reviewed the record and find

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.

    Bowie v. Henderson Police Dept,

    No. 5:12-cv-00514-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2012 & Jan. 9, 2013).


    dispense

    with

    contentions

    are

    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    We

    and

    legal

    materials

    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like