Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Coleman, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Carlyle Edgar Coleman appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court's opinion and found no reversible error. It denied Coleman's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Coleman was not entitled to relief under § 2255. The appeals court also denied Coleman's motion for reconsideration of the district court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-07-13 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6899

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Carlyle Edgar Coleman appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court's opinion and found no reversible error. It denied Coleman's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Coleman was not entitled to relief under § 2255. The appeals court also denied Coleman's motion for reconsideration of the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Coleman, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Carlyle Edgar Coleman appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court's opinion and found no reversible error. It denied Coleman's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Coleman was not entitled to relief under § 2255. The appeals court also denied Coleman's motion for reconsideration of the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6899

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    CARLYLE EDGAR COLEMAN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
    Judge. (CR-93-20, CA-96-840-R)

    Submitted:

    June 30, 1998

    Decided:

    July 13, 1998

    Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit
    Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Carlyle Edgar Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Carlyle Edgar Coleman seeks to appeal the district courts
    orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994
    & Supp. 1998) and his motion for reconsideration, Fed. R. Civ. P.
    59. We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion
    and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a
    certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Coleman, Nos. CR-93-20;
    CA-96-840-R (W.D. Va. May 16 & May 28, 1997). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like