Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    United States v. Bullock, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) James Allen Bullock appealed the district court's denial of his motion for free transcripts. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with the lower court's reasoning that Bullock was not entitled to free transcripts.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Bullock, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    1) James Allen Bullock appealed the district court's denial of his motion for free transcripts. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with the lower court's reasoning that Bullock was not entitled to free transcripts.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-05-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7775

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) James Allen Bullock appealed the district court's denial of his motion for free transcripts. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with the lower court's reasoning that Bullock was not entitled to free transcripts.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Bullock, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) James Allen Bullock appealed the district court's denial of his motion for free transcripts. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with the lower court's reasoning that Bullock was not entitled to free transcripts.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7775

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JAMES ALLEN BULLOCK, a/k/a Man,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief
    District Judge. (CR-92-194-D)

    Submitted:

    April 29, 1999

    Decided:

    May 4, 1999

    Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    James Allen Bullock, Appellant Pro Se. John Warren Stone, Jr.,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    James Allen Bullock appeals the district courts order denying
    his motion for production of transcripts at government expense. We
    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error.
    the district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of


    See United States v. Bullock, No. CR-92-194-D

    (M.D.N.C. Nov. 23, 1998).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like