Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Hunt, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Charles Bennie Hunt's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. It therefore denied Hunt's motion for appointment of counsel and affirmed the district court's decision to deny the motion to reduce Hunt's sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-05-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7854

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Charles Bennie Hunt's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. It therefore denied Hunt's motion for appointment of counsel and affirmed the district court's decision to deny the motion to reduce Hunt's sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    United States v. Hunt, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Charles Bennie Hunt's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. It therefore denied Hunt's motion for appointment of counsel and affirmed the district court's decision to deny the motion to reduce Hunt's sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7854

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    CHARLES BENNIE HUNT,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
    District Judge. (CR-88-177-C-P)
    Submitted:

    May 16, 1996

    Decided:

    May 29, 1996

    Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Charles Bennie Hunt, Appellant Pro Se.
    Harry Thomas Church,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
    motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. 3582(c)(2) (West Supp. 1995). We
    have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find
    no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion for
    appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. United States v. Hunt, No. CR-88-177-C-P (W.D.N.C. Sept. 29,
    1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like