Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Spencer V., 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    Michael Lee Spencer filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to act on two motions he had filed. The district court had not yet ruled on Spencer's motion for declaratory and injunctive relief or his motion for an accelerated hearing that were both filed in June 2001. However, the district court entered an order on August 24, 2001 denying both of Spencer's motions. As the district court had now ruled on the motions, Spencer's petition for mandamus was deemed moot. The court therefore denied the petition for writ of mandamus.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-11-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7467

    Original Title

    In re: Spencer v., 4th Cir. (2001)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michael Lee Spencer filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to act on two motions he had filed. The district court had not yet ruled on Spencer's motion for declaratory and injunctive relief or his motion for an accelerated hearing that were both filed in June 2001. However, the district court entered an order on August 24, 2001 denying both of Spencer's motions. As the district court had now ruled on the motions, Spencer's petition for mandamus was deemed moot. The court therefore denied the petition for writ of mandamus.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    In Re: Spencer V., 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Lee Spencer filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to act on two motions he had filed. The district court had not yet ruled on Spencer's motion for declaratory and injunctive relief or his motion for an accelerated hearing that were both filed in June 2001. However, the district court entered an order on August 24, 2001 denying both of Spencer's motions. As the district court had now ruled on the motions, Spencer's petition for mandamus was deemed moot. The court therefore denied the petition for writ of mandamus.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7467

    In Re: MICHAEL LEE SPENCER, SR.,


    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

    Submitted:

    November 8, 2001

    (CA-00-1644-AM)

    Decided:

    November 20, 2001

    Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Michael Lee Spencer, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    On August 1, 2001, Michael Lee Spencer, Sr., filed this petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district
    court to act on his motion for declaratory and injunctive relief
    and on his motion for an accelerated hearing, both filed in the
    district court on June 26, 2001.

    The district court entered an

    order denying both of these motions on August 24, 2001; Spencers


    petition for mandamus is therefore moot.

    Accordingly, although we

    grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this petition, we deny


    the petition for writ of mandamus.

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like