Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    United States v. Gutierrez, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's orders that granted Oscar Rico Gutierrez's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and imposed a new sentence. The district court denied Gutierrez's motion for reconsideration. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. It therefore affirmed the district court's decisions on the reasoning stated in its opinions dated June 9, 1997 and August 21, 1997.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Gutierrez, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's orders that granted Oscar Rico Gutierrez's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and imposed a new sentence. The district court denied Gutierrez's motion for reconsideration. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. It therefore affirmed the district court's decisions on the reasoning stated in its opinions dated June 9, 1997 and August 21, 1997.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-03-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-7245

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's orders that granted Oscar Rico Gutierrez's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and imposed a new sentence. The district court denied Gutierrez's motion for reconsideration. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. It therefore affirmed the district court's decisions on the reasoning stated in its opinions dated June 9, 1997 and August 21, 1997.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Gutierrez, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's orders that granted Oscar Rico Gutierrez's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and imposed a new sentence. The district court denied Gutierrez's motion for reconsideration. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. It therefore affirmed the district court's decisions on the reasoning stated in its opinions dated June 9, 1997 and August 21, 1997.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-7245

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    OSCAR RICO GUTIERREZ,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston. Falcon B. Hawkins, Chief District
    Judge. (CR-90-232, CA-96-2444-2-11)
    Submitted:

    February 26, 1998

    Decided:

    March 18, 1998

    Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Oscar Rico Gutierrez, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hayden Bickerton,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's orders granting his
    motion for a reduction in his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A.
    3582(c)(2) (West 1985 & Supp. 1997), imposing a new sentence, and
    denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, deny Appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal and affirm
    on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Gutierrez,
    Nos. CR-90-232; CA-96-2444-2-11 (D.S.C. June 9, 1997 & Aug. 21,
    1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like