Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Sikka v. Rumsfeld, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of an unpublished United States Court of Appeals case. Mahesh Sikka appealed a district court decision granting summary judgment to the defendants in Sikka's Title VII action. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling for substantially the same reasons. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-06-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-1121

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of an unpublished United States Court of Appeals case. Mahesh Sikka appealed a district court decision granting summary judgment to the defendants in Sikka's Title VII action. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling for substantially the same reasons. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Sikka v. Rumsfeld, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of an unpublished United States Court of Appeals case. Mahesh Sikka appealed a district court decision granting summary judgment to the defendants in Sikka's Title VII action. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling for substantially the same reasons. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-1121

    MAHESH C. SIKKA,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Secretary, Department of
    Defense; U. S. DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Robert E. Payne, District
    Judge. (CA-03-895-3)

    Submitted:

    May 18, 2005

    Decided:

    June 8, 2005

    Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Mahesh C. Sikka, Appellant Pro Se. Robert P. McIntosh, OFFICE OF


    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Mahesh

    C.

    Sikka

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    adopting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and


    granting summary judgment for Defendants on Sikkas Title VII
    action.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the


    district court.

    See Sikka v. Rumsfeld, No. CA-03-895-3 (E.D. Va.

    Nov. 16, 2004).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like