Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Pittman v. Hardee, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of an employment discrimination action filed by Derneck L. Pittman against Dennis Hardee, Royce Davis, and Elkay Southern, Incorporated. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-05-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-2736

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of an employment discrimination action filed by Derneck L. Pittman against Dennis Hardee, Royce Davis, and Elkay Southern, Incorporated. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Pittman v. Hardee, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of an employment discrimination action filed by Derneck L. Pittman against Dennis Hardee, Royce Davis, and Elkay Southern, Incorporated. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-2736

    DERNECK L. PITTMAN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DENNIS HARDEE; ROYCE DAVIS; ELKAY SOUTHERN,
    INCORPORATED,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, District
    Judge. (CA-97-19-F)
    Submitted:

    May 14, 1998

    Decided:

    May 21, 1998

    Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Derneck L. Pittman, Appellant Pro Se. John S. Burgin, OGLETREE,
    DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, Raleigh, North Carolina; Tracey
    Lynne Truesdale, MURPHY, SMITH & POLK, Chicago, Illinois, for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his
    employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and
    the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pittman v.
    Hardee, No. CA-97-19-F (E.D.N.C. Nov. 14, 1997). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like