Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Bynum v. Allsbrook, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Olander R. Bynum of the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief. As such, the Fourth Circuit denied Bynum a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-06-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6000

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Olander R. Bynum of the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief. As such, the Fourth Circuit denied Bynum a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Bynum v. Allsbrook, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Olander R. Bynum of the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief. As such, the Fourth Circuit denied Bynum a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6000

    OLANDER R. BYNUM,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    HARRY L. ALLSBROOK,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
    Judge. (CA-97-495-5-H)
    Submitted:

    May 14, 1998

    Decided:

    June 2, 1998

    Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Olander R. Bynum, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca Kendrick Cleveland,
    Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court. Bynum v. Allsbrook, No. CA-97-495-5-H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 12,
    1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like