Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    United States v. Gray, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Clarence Bernard Gray's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its May 8, 1998 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Gray, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Clarence Bernard Gray's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its May 8, 1998 order.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-11-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6768

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Clarence Bernard Gray's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its May 8, 1998 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Gray, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Clarence Bernard Gray's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its May 8, 1998 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6768

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    CLARENCE BERNARD GRAY,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr.,
    District Judge. (CR-94-241, CA-97-453-2)

    Submitted:

    October 8, 1998

    Decided:

    November 30, 1998

    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Clarence Bernard Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Clarence Bernard Gray seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994
    & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district courts
    opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court. United States v. Gray, No. CR-94-241; CA-97-453-2 (M.D.N.C.
    May 8, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like