Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Linder v. United States, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2009. Michael Linder, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The court affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-04-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-8217

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2009. Michael Linder, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The court affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Linder v. United States, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2009. Michael Linder, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The court affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-8217

    MICHAEL LINDER,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Dever III,
    District Judge. (5:09-hc-02094-D)

    Submitted:

    April 22, 2010

    Decided:

    April 27, 2010

    Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Linder, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael

    Linder,

    federal

    prisoner,

    appeals

    the

    district courts order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241


    (2006)

    petition.

    reversible error.

    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    Linder v. United States, No. 5:09-hc-

    02094-D

    20,

    (E.D.N.C.

    Oct.

    2009).

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like