Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    Roger Baxter v. S v. Pruett, Warden M.D. Sharker Nurse Trail, 944 F.2d 900, 4th Cir. (1991)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1. This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a plaintiff, Roger Baxter, appealing the denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by the district court. 2. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Baxter's appeal based on its review of the record and the district court's opinion. 3. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the relevant facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Roger Baxter v. S v. Pruett, Warden M.D. Sharker Nurse Trail, 944 F.2d 900, 4th Cir. (1991)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    1. This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a plaintiff, Roger Baxter, appealing the denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by the district court. 2. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Baxter's appeal based on its review of the record and the district court's opinion. 3. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the relevant facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1991-09-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 944 F.2d 900 Docket: 91-7137

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1. This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a plaintiff, Roger Baxter, appealing the denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by the district court. 2. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Baxter's appeal based on its review of the record and the district court's opinion. 3. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the relevant facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Roger Baxter v. S v. Pruett, Warden M.D. Sharker Nurse Trail, 944 F.2d 900, 4th Cir. (1991)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1. This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a plaintiff, Roger Baxter, appealing the denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by the district court. 2. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Baxter's appeal based on its review of the record and the district court's opinion. 3. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the relevant facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    944 F.

    2d 900

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Roger BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    S.V. PRUETT, Warden; M.D. SHARKER; NURSE TRAIL,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 91-7137.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Aug. 26, 1991.
    Decided Sept. 16, 1991.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA89-1727-AM)
    Roger Baxter, appellant pro se.
    Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Sandra Morris
    Holleran, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Richmond, Va., for
    appellees.
    E.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    OPINION
    PER CURIAM:

    Roger Baxter appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42
    U.S.C. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Baxter v. Pruett, CA-89-1727-AM (E.D.Va. May
    20, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like