Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Prevatte v. Cross, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Ted A. Prevatte, a North Carolina inmate. The district court had denied relief on Prevatte's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Prevatte's appeal to be frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court. Oral arguments were dispensed with because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-01-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7192

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Ted A. Prevatte, a North Carolina inmate. The district court had denied relief on Prevatte's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Prevatte's appeal to be frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court. Oral arguments were dispensed with because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Prevatte v. Cross, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Ted A. Prevatte, a North Carolina inmate. The district court had denied relief on Prevatte's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Prevatte's appeal to be frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court. Oral arguments were dispensed with because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7192

    TED ANTHONY PREVATTE,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    HOWARD CROSS; P. L. CANNADY; JAMES B. FRENCH;
    DANIEL L. STIENEKE; MACK JARVIS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
    Judge. (CA-98-428-5-H)

    Submitted:

    January 7, 1999

    Decided:

    January 19, 1999

    Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Ted Anthony Prevatte, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Ted A. Prevatte, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district
    courts order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp.
    1998) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. 1915A (West Supp. 1998).

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    that this appeal is frivolous.

    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

    on the reasoning of the district court.


    98-428-5-H

    (E.D.N.C.

    July

    28,

    1998).

    Prevatte v. Cross, No. CAWe

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like