Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Mears v. United States, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Richard Dean Mears' petition for a writ of mandamus. The three-judge panel found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision based on the reasoning provided in its November 9, 1995 opinion. The panel found that oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-04-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-8525

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Richard Dean Mears' petition for a writ of mandamus. The three-judge panel found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision based on the reasoning provided in its November 9, 1995 opinion. The panel found that oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Mears v. United States, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Richard Dean Mears' petition for a writ of mandamus. The three-judge panel found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision based on the reasoning provided in its November 9, 1995 opinion. The panel found that oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-8525

    RICHARD DEAN MEARS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; FEDERAL BUREAU OF
    PRISONS; JOHN HAHN, Warden; CALVIN WEAVER,
    Camp Administrator; ROBERT FLYNN, Counselor,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
    Judge. (CA-95-1561-A)
    Submitted:

    March 21, 1996

    Decided:

    April 29, 1996

    Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Richard Dean Mears, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
    petition for writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and the
    district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mears v. United
    States, No. CA-95-1561-A (E.D. Va. Nov. 9, 1995). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like