Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Lloyd v. Freeman, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (No. 98-6800). The plaintiff, Rickey R. Lloyd, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against defendants Franklin E. Freeman, Jr. and Lynn C. Phillips which was denied by the district court. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Lloyd v. Freeman, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (No. 98-6800). The plaintiff, Rickey R. Lloyd, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against defendants Franklin E. Freeman, Jr. and Lynn C. Phillips which was denied by the district court. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-03-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6800

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (No. 98-6800). The plaintiff, Rickey R. Lloyd, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against defendants Franklin E. Freeman, Jr. and Lynn C. Phillips which was denied by the district court. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Lloyd v. Freeman, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (No. 98-6800). The plaintiff, Rickey R. Lloyd, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against defendants Franklin E. Freeman, Jr. and Lynn C. Phillips which was denied by the district court. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6800

    RICKEY R. LLOYD,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    FRANKLIN E. FREEMAN, JR.; LYNN C. PHILLIPS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-97-106-3-MU)

    Submitted:

    February 25, 1999

    Decided:

    March 8, 1999

    Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Rickey R. Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See


    Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district courts order denying relief on
    his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint.

    We have re-

    viewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no
    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    district court. See Lloyd v. Freeman, No. CA-97-106-3-MU (W.D.N.C.


    May 11, 1998).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like