Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Tracy v. Murphy, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kevin Tracy, a Virginia inmate, filed a Section 1983 complaint against Nurse Murphy which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A. Tracy appealed. In an unpublished opinion, the Fourth Circuit found Tracy's appeal frivolous and dismissed it, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying relief. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Tracy v. Murphy, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Kevin Tracy, a Virginia inmate, filed a Section 1983 complaint against Nurse Murphy which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A. Tracy appealed. In an unpublished opinion, the Fourth Circuit found Tracy's appeal frivolous and dismissed it, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying relief. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-03-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6087

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Kevin Tracy, a Virginia inmate, filed a Section 1983 complaint against Nurse Murphy which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A. Tracy appealed. In an unpublished opinion, the Fourth Circuit found Tracy's appeal frivolous and dismissed it, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying relief. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Tracy v. Murphy, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kevin Tracy, a Virginia inmate, filed a Section 1983 complaint against Nurse Murphy which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A. Tracy appealed. In an unpublished opinion, the Fourth Circuit found Tracy's appeal frivolous and dismissed it, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying relief. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6087

    KEVIN TRACY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    NURSE MURPHY,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
    (CA-98-745-R)

    Submitted:

    March 11, 1999

    Decided:

    March 18, 1999

    Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Kevin Tracy, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Kevin Tracy, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district courts
    order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint under
    28 U.S.C.A. 1915A (West Supp. 1998).

    We have reviewed the record

    and the district courts opinion and find that this appeal is
    frivolous.

    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

    the district court. See Tracy v. Murphy, No. CA-98-745-R (W.D. Va.
    Jan. 4. 1999).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like