Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Kevin Dildy, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Kevin Dildy's request to appoint counsel. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling for the same reasons stated by the lower court in its July 29, 2005 decision. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-12-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-7574

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Kevin Dildy's request to appoint counsel. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling for the same reasons stated by the lower court in its July 29, 2005 decision. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    United States v. Kevin Dildy, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Kevin Dildy's request to appoint counsel. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling for the same reasons stated by the lower court in its July 29, 2005 decision. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-7574

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    KEVIN DILDY,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,
    Senior District Judge. (CR-00-8)

    Submitted: December 15, 2005

    Decided:

    December 22, 2005

    Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kevin Dildy, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Kevin Dildy appeals the district courts order dismissing
    his request to appoint counsel.
    find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.

    See United States v. Dildy, No. CR-

    00-8 (E.D. Va. July 29, 2005) .

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like