Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Varner v. NC Attorney General, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Danny Ray Varner appealed a magistrate judge's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the magistrate judge's decision. As a result, the appeals court denied Varner's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed his appeal, agreeing with the reasoning provided by the magistrate judge in denying Varner's habeas petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Varner v. NC Attorney General, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which Danny Ray Varner appealed a magistrate judge's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the magistrate judge's decision. As a result, the appeals court denied Varner's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed his appeal, agreeing with the reasoning provided by the magistrate judge in denying Varner's habeas petition.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-05-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7632

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case in which Danny Ray Varner appealed a magistrate judge's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the magistrate judge's decision. As a result, the appeals court denied Varner's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed his appeal, agreeing with the reasoning provided by the magistrate judge in denying Varner's habeas petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Varner v. NC Attorney General, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Danny Ray Varner appealed a magistrate judge's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the magistrate judge's decision. As a result, the appeals court denied Varner's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed his appeal, agreeing with the reasoning provided by the magistrate judge in denying Varner's habeas petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7632

    DANNY RAY VARNER,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY
    NORTH CAROLINA,

    GENERAL;

    STATE

    OF

    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Paul Trevor Sharp, Magistrate
    Judge. (CA-98-35-1)

    Submitted:

    April 30, 1999

    Decided:

    May 19, 1999

    Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit
    Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Danny Ray Varner, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Danny Ray Varner seeks to appeal the magistrate judges* order
    denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West
    1994 & Supp. 1998).

    We have reviewed the record and the magistrate

    judges opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny


    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Varner v. North Carolina Atty
    Gen., No. CA-98-35-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 1998).

    We dispense with

    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate


    judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. 636(c) (West 1993 & Supp. 1999).
    2

    You might also like