Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    McKenzie v. United States, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    John Ardell McKenzie filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief, which was denied by the district court. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court's denial of McKenzie's petition. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    McKenzie v. United States, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    John Ardell McKenzie filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief, which was denied by the district court. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court's denial of McKenzie's petition. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-06-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6465

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    John Ardell McKenzie filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief, which was denied by the district court. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court's denial of McKenzie's petition. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    McKenzie v. United States, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    John Ardell McKenzie filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief, which was denied by the district court. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court's denial of McKenzie's petition. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6465

    JOHN ARDELL MCKENZIE,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
    Judge. (CA-98-959-5-H)

    Submitted:

    June 17, 1999

    Decided:

    June 23, 1999

    Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    John Ardell McKenzie, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    John Ardell McKenzie seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254
    (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

    We have reviewed the record and the dis-

    trict courts opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly,

    we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on


    the reasoning of the district court. See McKenzie v. United States,
    No. CA-98-959-5-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 1999).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like