Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    United States v. Walker, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Jerome Walker appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as explained in United States v. Walker case Nos. CR-94-133 and CA-97-758.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Walker, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Jerome Walker appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as explained in United States v. Walker case Nos. CR-94-133 and CA-97-758.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-09-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6756

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Jerome Walker appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as explained in United States v. Walker case Nos. CR-94-133 and CA-97-758.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Walker, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Jerome Walker appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as explained in United States v. Walker case Nos. CR-94-133 and CA-97-758.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6756

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JEROME WALKER,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
    (CR-94-133, CA-97-758)

    Submitted:

    September 9, 1999

    Decided:

    September 15, 1999

    Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Jerome Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Jerome Walker seeks to appeal the district courts order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 1999).
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and
    find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See United States v. Walker, Nos. CR-94-133; CA-97-

    758 (E.D. Va. Apr. 27, 1999).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like